LEGIT A L0 · trustless
SimpleX Chat
SimpleX Chat

Decentralised messenger with no phone, email, or user IDs.

SimpleX Chat removes the user ID from messaging — and finds there is nothing left for a server to leak.

A messenger built on the premise that the most private identifier is the one that does not exist.

Jurisdiction United Kingdom
Operating since 2020
Category Messaging
Rubric v2.7

How it works

SimpleX replaces the conventional user account with a network of one-way message queues. To start a conversation, one party hands the other a single-use invitation link or QR code; both clients then post messages into queues hosted on relay servers that neither side controls. Each conversation lives on different servers, so no relay can stitch together a contact graph. Messages are end-to-end encrypted with a Double Ratchet adapted from Signal, and a recent post-quantum layer is added on top for forward-secret hybrid encryption. The clients run on iOS, Android, Linux, macOS, Windows and as a terminal binary. Operators who do not want to depend on the public servers can self-host both the SMP messaging relay and the XFTP file-transfer relay from the upstream Haskell repository.

KYC & privacy

There is nothing to KYC. Account creation asks for no phone number, no email, no captcha and no random ID — the local profile name and avatar never leave the device. The relay servers see only opaque queue identifiers and padded ciphertext; addresses, contact names and message content stay on the endpoints. The official server list is reachable over Tor, and the Android and desktop clients can be configured to use only .onion hosts. Trail of Bits has now reviewed both the implementation (2022) and the cryptographic protocol design (2024); the published reports list a small number of medium-severity findings, all addressed in subsequent releases.

Strengths and limits

The defining strength is structural: with no user identifier of any kind, a subpoena to a relay returns queue traffic that cannot be tied to a person. Two independent Trail of Bits audits are unusual for a project this young, and the apps are reproducible from the public Haskell sources. The trade-offs are practical. The mental model — invite links, separate queues per contact, manual server selection — is heavier than Signal's. There is no phone-book discovery, so growing a network requires sharing links out of band. The desktop client is functional but visibly less polished than the mobile builds, group features are still maturing, and the project's company entity, Simplex Chat Ltd, is a small UK outfit relative to the threat models it invites. None of these are privacy regressions; they are the cost of doing without identifiers.

Verdict

SimpleX is the most ambitious anti-metadata messenger currently shipping, and its design choices have held up under external review. The friction is real — this is not a drop-in Signal replacement for a casual user — but for anyone whose threat model includes the contact graph itself, the trade is worth making. Grade: A (9.4/10). Trust: LEGIT.

verdict.simplex.diff +5 pros −4 cons
what works
+ 01 No user identifiers at all — no phone, no email, not even a random handle
+ 02 Two Trail of Bits reviews (2022 implementation, 2024 cryptographic design)
+ 03 Self-hostable SMP and XFTP relays in Haskell, reproducible from source
+ 04 Tor onion hosts available, with onion-only mode in Android and desktop
+ 05 Native clients on iOS, Android, Linux, macOS, Windows and terminal
what to know
01 Heavier mental model than Signal: invite links and per-contact queues by hand
02 No phone-book discovery; network growth requires out-of-band link sharing
03 Desktop client is less polished than the mobile builds; group features still maturing
04 Small UK company entity backing a project that invites high-profile threat models

SimpleX is the most ambitious anti-metadata messenger currently shipping, and its design choices have held up under external review. The friction is real, but for anyone whose threat model includes the contact graph itself, the trade is worth making. Grade: A (9.4/10). Trust: LEGIT.