TRUSTED A L0 · trustless
Haveno
Haveno

Decentralised Monero-base P2P exchange forked from Bisq, with 2-of-3 multisig escrow over Tor.

XMR BTC ETH CASH SEPA

Haveno hands two of three keys to traders, then refuses to run the network — that is the entire pitch.

A Bisq fork that swapped Bitcoin for Monero, kept the multisig, and let third parties take the legal heat.

Jurisdiction decentralised
Operating since 2021
Category Exchanges
Rubric v2.7

How it works

Haveno is a desktop client written in Java that connects to a P2P exchange network entirely over Tor. Each trade is a 2-of-3 multisig contract on the Monero blockchain: the buyer holds one key, the seller holds another, and a network arbitrator holds the third. Two signatures release funds, so the arbitrator alone cannot move them.

Crypto pairs are XMR-base — XMR↔BTC, XMR↔ETH, plus a long tail of altcoins. Fiat trades use real-world rails: SEPA, Zelle, PayPal in some networks, cash by mail, or face-to-face meets. The flow is: maker posts an offer, taker accepts, both lock collateral into the multisig, the fiat or crypto-out leg settles off-platform, and once both parties sign off, the multisig releases.

Crucially, the official haveno-dex repository does not operate a mainnet network. The project explicitly does not endorse any instance. Third-party operators — running their own seed nodes and arbitrators — host the actual networks where real trades clear. Users pick which network to join.

KYC & privacy

Haveno is non-KYC by architecture. There is no signup, no account, no email, no phone number. The client speaks only over Tor; the protocol does not collect IP addresses by design. Trade peers exchange counterparty payment details — a SEPA IBAN, a cash-meet location — directly through the encrypted P2P layer, and that data lives on the two clients' machines.

The threat surface is the network operator and arbitrator. When a dispute is opened, the arbitrator sees the trade contract and the dispute log. They never see funds — multisig keeps custody on the traders — but they do see counterparty identifiers if the dispute escalates. Picking a reputable network instance matters as much as the protocol itself.

Strengths and limits

The custody model is the strongest point: funds stay in multisig until traders agree, or until two of three keys sign in dispute. Combined with Monero's base-layer privacy, an adversary who subpoenas a single network operator finds no cold wallet to seize and no KYC database to pull. The code is AGPL-3.0 on GitHub; v1.2.3 shipped in February 2026 and the project pushes regular releases.

The limits are real. There is no formal third-party security audit at the time of writing — the codebase is open, but no firm has signed off. Liquidity is offer-driven and uneven outside major fiat pairs. The desktop-only Java client is heavy and slow to onboard. And the third-party-network model means the actual trust level depends on which instance you join, not on the upstream project.

Verdict

For users who want fiat-to-XMR without surrendering identity, Haveno is one of the few architecturally honest options on the table. The third-party-network split keeps upstream maintainers out of regulatory crosshairs at the cost of pushing trust onto whichever instance you connect to.

verdict.haveno.diff +4 pros −4 cons
what works
+ 01 2-of-3 Monero multisig — buyer, seller, arbitrator each hold one key, funds need two
+ 02 Open-source AGPL-3.0; v1.2.3 shipped Feb 2026 with active release cadence
+ 03 Tor-only transport, no signup, no email, no IP collection by protocol
+ 04 Bisq's pattern ported to XMR — fiat-to-Monero without an account or KYC
what to know
01 No formal third-party security audit at v1.2.3
02 Liquidity is thin outside major fiat pairs and depends on the network you join
03 Desktop-only Java client; no mobile or web clients
04 Trust is pushed to third-party network operators, not the upstream project

For users who want fiat-to-XMR without surrendering identity, Haveno is one of the few architecturally honest options on the table. The third-party-network split keeps upstream maintainers out of regulatory crosshairs at the cost of pushing trust onto whichever instance you connect to. Grade: A (9.0/10). Trust: TRUSTED.